PDA

View Full Version : "Superheroes to our rescue"


goldenboy
09-18-2007, 01:29 PM
OK, nothing hugely insightful or groundbreaking here, but I'm always intrigued when writers try to dissect the culture through TV. Maybe this should be in Aliens Among Us? I guess a mod can move it if so.

Superheroes to our rescue

In a troubled time, the new TV season offers solace of heroism

By David Zurawik | Sun television critic

September 16, 2007

As news reports focus on the Hurricane Katrina aftermath, the Sept. 11 anniversary, economic uncertainty and a controversial assessment of the Iraq war, a new TV season arrives this week steeped in a dark awareness of the harsh realities of American life.

But the networks' fall lineup also offers hope - an array of primetime heroes that includes a New Orleans police officer who reclaims his hurricane-ravaged hometown and a time-traveling newspaper reporter who can change history.

Though many of these heroes are deeply conflicted and in danger of losing their way morally, they ultimately drive a narrative of salvation.

It's a television trend that has not been seen since the 1970s, when the nation's confidence had been shaken in the wake of Watergate, rampant inflation and an early recognition of America's dependence on foreign oil.

"Dark times call for superheroes," says David Lavery, professor of television and film at Brunel University in London and author of Saving the World: A Guide to Heroes. "The proliferation of TV heroes this fall is similar not only to what happened in the late 1970s with shows like The Bionic Woman on network television, but also with comic books during World War II, when you had Superman and Captain America fighting Nazis.

"All these heroes and superheroes headed our way this fall on TV are a direct response to the dark times in which we live."

The relationship between national trauma and prime-time storytelling is crystal clear in K-Ville, a series premiering tomorrow night on Fox that the producers describe as a "heroic police drama."

Set in New Orleans two years after Katrina, the pilot opens with a re-creation of the chaos in the city's Lower Ninth Ward right after the storm. One police officer is shown fearlessly rescuing victims and trying to maintain order, while his partner cracks under the pressure and flees his post.

As the pilot settles into modern-day storytelling, the police officer who held his ground is shown struggling to accept a new partner, a former soldier who has just returned from Afghanistan bearing psychic scars.

Beyond a lead character who serves as a constant reminder of an America at war, virtually every scene in the pilot is stacked with references to the storm and stark images of the devastation that remains.


American angst
NBC's remake of The Bionic Woman, one of the most-discussed new fall series, is also a response to a widespread American angst, says David Eick, the show's executive producer.

"It does seem that during troubled times, our storytelling turns to the allegorical. And I would characterize these times as troubling, to put it mildly," says Eick, whose series debuts Sept. 26.

Comparing his Bionic Woman to the original, which ran on ABC in 1976-1977 and NBC in 1977-1978, Eick says that where the original Jaime Sommers was a one-dimensional image of empowerment created in response to the women's liberation movement, the new version features a more conflicted character.

"I think the angle that that original show was taking had a lot to do with the different social movements in the culture, whether it was women's lib" or the Equal Rights Amendment, says Eick, who was executive producer on such successful sci-fi hero series as Battlestar Gallactica and Xena: Warrior Princess.

"But rather than an action girl who's real intimidating and in your face in proving to you that she's not going to be underestimated, what if you had a girl for whom these abilities were as shocking and unusual and difficult to juggle as they would be to you and me?

"What if she is out of sorts with her powers?"

Conflicted feelings
That describes a panoply of heroes about to hit the airwaves.

There's Chuck on NBC, a drama about a computer nerd who suddenly finds himself a target of the CIA after a rogue agent downloads a computer chip full of secrets into Chuck's brain.

Because of the data, Chuck (Zachary Levi) can anticipate events including political assassinations and coups, and help authorities thwart them.

He fears and hates his newfound power but nevertheless responds to its call in this series from executive producer Josh Schwartz (The O.C.), which premieres Sept. 24.

On NBC's Journeyman, which arrives Sept. 24, Kevin McKidd (Rome) plays a San Francisco newspaper reporter who suddenly finds that he can time-travel and change the course of events. But rather than feeling empowered, he sees it as a curse.

"He does have this power," McKidd says of the hero he plays, "but he isn't actually in control of it. It's very erratic, and he has to learn to deal with this affliction."

More than a half-dozen series built along the same lines will be appearing in coming weeks and months on ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox and CW.

That competition among similar shows is likely to leave some casualties.

The networks often go overboard in trying to imitate hit shows, and one reason so many serialized dramas failed last fall was that there were too many aiming to be the next 24. This season, the networks could well be making the same mistake in trying to duplicate the success of Heroes.

The return
That NBC show, which returns Sept. 24, was the only one of more than a dozen serialized dramas last year to become a ratings hit.

Drenched in Sept. 11 imagery, the series tells the story of ordinary people who discover they have extraordinary powers and join to save New York City from an apocalyptic attack.

Like many of the new fall offerings, Heroes had a somber side.

"One thing a lot of people don't admit about Heroes is that it's a very dark show," says Lavery, whose book on the series will be released this month. This isn't your standard Captain America fare. These are deeply conflicted people who are going through deep struggles, and that is in many of these new series as well.

"Something is happening in the culture now where one of the definitions of good television involves the characters being morally conflicted. And maybe that tells us a ton, too. Whereas we have a president who says he never has a doubt, our best television is now about characters who are riddled with doubts in shows like The Sopranos and The Wire."

It is also significant, analysts say, that heroism is being explored in prime-time programs as voters are trying to decide which presidential candidate can lead the nation out of its slump. Beyond the obvious entertainment quotient, the lineup of new series this fall offers a nightly referendum on leadership.

"What interests me are the women heroes and the fact that in our search for people who can lead us, many Americans are wondering if a woman can do it," says University of Southern California professor Diane Winston, focusing on such characters as Jaime Sommers (Michelle Ryan) and cable newcomers played by Holly Hunter, in TNT's Saving Grace, and Glenn Close, in FX's Damages.

"And it's not necessarily coincidental that these strong, flawed women are arriving on television at the same time that a strong, flawed woman, Hillary Clinton, is making an impressive run for the presidency."

Again, the similarity to the late 1970s, when the last cycle of heroes and superheroes ruled the network airwaves, is noteworthy, the experts say.

Voters then were about to decide between Democratic President Jimmy Carter, whose administration was associated with talk of a national "malaise," and Republican Ronald Reagan, who presented a "morning in America" optimism.

The new women
"In the '70s, we had women as heroes, but they were comic book characters," says Winston, who holds the Knight Chair in Media and Religion at USC and has written extensively about the new TV season at her Web site, uscmediareligion.org.

"Whether it was Charlie's Angels or Wonder Woman, it was about their physical attributes, not their leadership qualities. And so you could not take them seriously.

"But with this new crop of women heroes, they are attractive, flawed and believable, and there's no doubt about their ability to lead. That's cultural change."

Looking across the TV landscape, Winston says, she is struck by the extent to which prime-time entertainment programming has been shaped by terrorist attacks, natural disasters and war.

"Whether we're talking about all the new TV series with heroes, or just the programs with heroes who have supernatural or higher spiritual powers, we're talking about the same impulse in religion and popular culture," Winston says.

"Events remind us how precarious life can be, and, in response, we seek out stories that reassure us that our lives have meaning and we can transcend the darkest times."

Superheroes to our rescue -- baltimoresun.com (http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bal-te.al.heroes16sep16,0,1140553.story?page=1)

N4H
09-18-2007, 01:58 PM
And there's the "with great power comes great responsibility", that pops up all over the place, because, you know...we wish.

goldenboy
09-18-2007, 02:12 PM
So, what's the most overt allegorical show out there right now? I'd say it's Battlestar. Very post-9/11, America-at-war, fighting against the the alien "other" (yet, strangely of their own making). Complete with sleeper agents, suicide bombers...

N4H
09-18-2007, 04:58 PM
Makes sense.

This one isn't TV, but I think one could make a case for it being political. The new Buffy comic.

goldenboy
09-18-2007, 05:19 PM
Yeah. It's kind of like Firefly/Serenity political—in terms of putting vague political/power concepts out on the table. Like you can almost plug different real world people into these scenarios, come up with different interpretations. I can remember people seeing George W Bush as the enemy in Serenity...or corporations, or Big Government...

I always thought Whedon seemed overly caricaturish, simplistic when it came to portraying the mililtary, in general. I dunno.

I'm really curious how Twilight is gonna play out. Seems like a big, far-reaching...cabal or whatever it is.

goldenboy
09-20-2007, 02:28 PM
In a recent interview with Infoshop News, Alan Moore talked about the impact, or lack thereof, the film 'V for Vendetta' had on the American public. The commentary is lead in by the interviewer telling Moore about an "A for Anarchy" group that used the film as a springboard for their own message:

Infoshop News: Some anarchist activist types started tabling outside of the movie showings with information about how Hollywood had taken the politics out of the movie.

Alan Moore: Ah, now that is fantastic, that is really good to hear, because that’s one of the things that had distressed me. What had originally been a straightforward battle of ideas between anarchy and fascism had been turned into a kind of ham-fisted parable of 9-11 and the war against terror, in which the words anarchy and fascism appear nowhere. I mean, at the time I was thinking: look, if they wanted to protest about George Bush and the way that American society is going since 9-11—which would completely understandable—then why don’t they do what I did back in the 1980s when I didn’t like the way that England was going under Margaret Thatcher, which is to do a story in my own country, that was clearly about events that were happening right then in my own country, and kind of make it obvious that that’s what you’re talking about. It struck me that for Hollywood to make V for Vendetta, it was a way for thwarted and impotent American liberals to feel that they were making some kind of statement about how pissed off they were with the current situation without really risking anything. It’s all set in England, which I think that probably, in most American eyes, is kind of a fairytale kingdom where we still perhaps still have giants. It doesn’t really exist; it might as well be in the Land of Oz for most Americans. So you can get set your political parable in this fantasy environment called England, and then you can vent your spleen against George Bush and the neo- conservatives. Those were my feelings, and I must admit those are completely based upon not having seen the film even once, but having read a certain amount of the screenplay. That was enough.

But that’s really interesting about the A for Anarchy demonstrations. That’s fantastic.

Moore calls 'Vendetta' risk-free expression by "impotent liberals" - Story @ Comics2Film.com (http://www.comics2film.com/index.php?a=story&b=29065)


I haven't seen V for Vendetta. I know most of you guys that saw it really liked it. Did you pick up on an anti-Bush-war-on-terror vibe?

I tried reading the rest of this interview with Alan Moore, my eyes were starting to glaze over a bit, lol. I can't exactly relate to his radical stance on power and politics, but I get where he's coming from.

N4H
09-20-2007, 05:57 PM
I don't think there is a left or a right bias in the movie. It's more about when control get's out of control. I can see how that might piss off a writer who's more left wing bent, because myself I chose to see the fascists as more 1984 socialist types. For me it's a case of screw the writer here, though, because I enjoyed the Hell out of it the way I viewed it. :tongue:

goldenboy
09-21-2007, 08:15 AM
I'm kinda confused as to why Moore stuck with DC all these years—since he seems to so hate anyone, anything messing with his work. Maybe that didn't happen till he saw the results here and there. But you'd think he'd be interested in creator-owned books (being the anarchist that he is, lol). Maybe the cash was a factor too...

N4H
09-21-2007, 11:38 AM
Is Moore considered an anarchist? I don't see why he'd object to V then, because really the movie is more apolitical like Harlan Ellison's Repent Harlequin Said the Tick Tock Man. I say 1984 a bit also, because it has that dark, Britishy feel to it, but the politics themselves are fuzzy.

goldenboy
09-21-2007, 11:54 AM
Yeah, it probably would help if he'd actually see the film.

I don't know if he's literally an anarchist. Why would he be participating in the evil capitalist system? Seems attracted to the themes at any rate...

It was later, as I went into my twenties and started to think about things more seriously that I came to a conclusion that basically the only political standpoint that I could possibly adhere to would be an anarchist one.

It furthermore occurred to me that, basically, anarchy is in fact the only political position that is actually possible. I believe that all other political states are in fact variations or outgrowths of a basic state of anarchy; after all, when you mention the idea of anarchy to most people they will tell you what a bad idea it is because the biggest gang would just take over. Which is pretty much how I see contemporary society. We live in a badly developed anarchist situation in which the biggest gang has taken over and have declared that it is not an anarchist situation—that it is a capitalist or a communist situation. But I tend to think that anarchy is the most natural form of politics for a human being to actually practice. All it means, the word, is no leaders. An-archon. No leaders.